Night MovesDirector: Kelly Reichardt
Screenplay: Jon Raymond, Kelly Reichardt
Producers: Neil Kopp, Anish Savjani, Chris Maybach, Saemi Kim, Rodrigo Teixeira
Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Dakota Fanning, Peter Sarsgaard
Year: 2013
Country: USA
BBFC Certification:
Duration: 112 mins

The recently concluded BFI London Film Festival provided me the opportunity to attend a couple of screenings of which this film was one. Night Moves featured in the Festival’s Debate gala, which showcased “riveting films that amplify, scrutinise, argue and surprise.” I can certainly vouch that this film hit 3 of the 5 descriptors, but will leave you to decide which 3, if you just read on.

For one thing, the subject matter of eco-terrorism is automatically controversial because it begs the question: where do you draw the line when “the end justifies the means”?

The film painstakingly paints a portrait of the main protagonists, particularly Jesse Eisenberg’s character, Josh, and to a slightly lesser extent the characters of Dena and Harmon, respectively played by Dakota Fanning and Peter Sarsgaard. These three characters plot and execute a daring mission to blow up a dam in a radical gesture to stick one up the nose of a faceless and presumably evil corporation. They are driven by righteous zeal to right the wrongs done to the planet, and go to great lengths to carry out their plan, but this story is less concerned with the plan or its success, despite spending over half the running time to get there. It really focuses mostly on how these characters deal with the consequence of their actions, and how they begin to unravel when faced with blanket national news coverage of an unintended victim of their bomb attack, who dies in the resulting flood from the burst dam.


The key questions explored by this movie include: what type of people undertake acts of eco-terrorism? What motivates them, and how do they live with themselves afterwards? It’s probably unfair to believe most eco-warriors fit in the mould portrayed by these damaged characters, but any bunch of people that willingly drive a boat packed with home-made explosives to a dam in order to make a point, have the makings for a good film character study

Josh (i.e. Jesse Eisenberg in full scowl mode), is a broody, melancholic and borderline psycho young man with very dark ideas on right and wrong. He is very intensely portrayed, with extreme tight close-ups and long, silent almost still takes, that convey his underlying menace. We get to watch as he navigates his way to exact the ultimate price for his fear of betrayal by the highly anxious Dena, an ex-socialite, thrill seeker with deep pockets, who financed the whole operation. Mix them in with Harmon, a reclusive ex-marine / ex-con, bomb-making expert, played by Peter Sarsgaard, and you could almost write the rest of the film with your arm in a sling. Surprising, it is not. In fact, boring may be a more apt description, given the slowness of the film, especially during the elongated, quiet, still close-up shots – e.g. the threesome travelling on a fertilizer-bomb laden boat to blow up the dam.

 Night Moves

The one bright spot for me was to see Jesse Eisenberg in a dark, menacing role which he carried off with great aplomb. Ok, yes, the cinematography was great, and there are some moments of near levity (mainly from Peter Sarsgaard), building tension and some breath-taking natural beauty (in Oregon), but the film is a bit too long, too slow, and ultimately a too boring affair, which not even the excellent and talented cast, or the incendiary subject matter, could hope to rescue. It is definitely not my cup of fertilizer.

About The Author

Film and music lover, producer and critic; Author, Blogger and Entrepreneur; Mascot (part time), Foodie (full time) and IT Consultant / Rights Management Evangelist (time permitting).

2 Responses

  1. David Brook

    Sounds disappointing. Have you seen any of Kelly Reichart’s previous films? I saw Meeks Cutoff, which was slow with not much in the way of plot, but I found it strangely captivating and beautifully made. It ends on a highly frustrating unresolved note though.

  2. Judeumeh

    That’s just it, the film is beautiful in places and very well shot overall, however the tension between what you know to be a highly combustible topic (i.e. eco-terrorism) and the slo-o-ow elaborate style is exhausting and leaves you with that feeling of an itch you can’t quite scratch – simply frustrating. But that could just be her objective, in which case job done.

    No, I haven’t seen her ‘Meeks Cutoff’ to compare, but I can only imagine how much more controversial this particular film might have been with someone perhaps like Lars Von Trier at the helm. Ouch!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

To help us avoid spam comments, please answer this simple question to prove you are human: * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.